AI Visibility Profile · Industry · Messaging Apps
Threema AI Visibility in Messaging Apps
Threema ranks #16 of 29 in the Messaging Apps AI visibility leaderboard with a 17.2 AI Index across 6 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How Threema appears in AI search
Threema currently ranks #16 out of 29 in the Messaging Apps AI visibility leaderboard with a 17.2 AI Index across 6 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Threema AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention Threema, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
Threema is currently #16 out of 29 entities in Messaging Apps, with a 17.2 overall AI visibility score across 6 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.
Threema is currently #24 out of 30 tracked Messaging Apps entities, with a 10.7 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Threema trails imo by 0.9 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Kimi, where Threema records a 16.7 AI Index and 14.3% mention rate. gemini is the next strongest covered engine at 14.7 with a 14.3% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is ChatGPT, where Threema records a 4 AI Index and 0% mention rate. Grok is another engine to watch at 5 with a 0% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Threema in Messaging Apps prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.
Threema's strongest current visibility comes from gemini (37.9 AI Index, 57.1% mention rate) and Grok (16.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is MiniMax (10 AI Index, 0% mention rate) and ChatGPT (11 AI Index, 0% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Threema or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Threema AI visibility trendThreema's latest visible AI Index is 10.7. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.
Threema improved over the visible trend window, moving from 11.4 on 2026-05-01 to 21.9 on 2026-06-26. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
KakaoTalk is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Threema behind it by 0.7 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is Threema ranked in the Messaging Apps leaderboard?
Threema is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Messaging Apps prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for Threema?
The strongest current signal is Kimi at 16.7 AI Index and 14.3% mention rate. The softest covered signal is ChatGPT at 4 AI Index and 0% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with Threema?
The most useful nearby comparison is imo. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed Messaging Apps leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-10.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 6 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Messaging Apps.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.