AI Visibility Profile · Industry · Messaging Apps
imo AI Visibility in Messaging Apps
imo ranks #21 of 29 in the Messaging Apps AI visibility leaderboard with a 9 AI Index across 5 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How imo appears in AI search
imo currently ranks #21 out of 29 in the Messaging Apps AI visibility leaderboard with a 9 AI Index across 5 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for imo AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention imo, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
imo is currently #21 out of 29 entities in Messaging Apps, with a 9 overall AI visibility score across 5 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.
imo is currently #23 out of 30 tracked Messaging Apps entities, with a 11.7 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. imo trails VK Messenger by 0.3 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Grok, where imo records a 14 AI Index and 0% mention rate. gemini is the next strongest covered engine at 13 with a 0% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is ChatGPT, where imo records a 9 AI Index and 0% mention rate. DeepSeek is another engine to watch at 9 with a 0% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface imo in Messaging Apps prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.
imo's strongest current visibility comes from Grok (13 AI Index, 0% mention rate) and Qwen (13 AI Index, 0% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is gemini (3 AI Index, 0% mention rate) and Kimi (4 AI Index, 0% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for imo or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Open trend explorerimo's latest visible AI Index is 11.7. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.
imo softened over the visible trend window, moving from 11.5 on 2026-05-01 to 9.3 on 2026-06-26. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
Element is the closest comparable entity by rank, with imo behind it by 0.6 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is imo ranked in the Messaging Apps leaderboard?
imo is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Messaging Apps prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for imo?
The strongest current signal is Grok at 14 AI Index and 0% mention rate. The softest covered signal is ChatGPT at 9 AI Index and 0% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with imo?
The most useful nearby comparison is VK Messenger. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed Messaging Apps leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-10.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 5 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Messaging Apps.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.