AI Visibility Profile · Category · AI Search Engines
Elicit AI Visibility in AI Search Engines
Elicit ranks #5 of 18 in the AI Search Engines AI visibility leaderboard with a 87 AI Index across 5 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How Elicit appears in AI search
Elicit currently ranks #5 out of 18 in the AI Search Engines AI visibility leaderboard with a 87 AI Index across 5 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Elicit AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention Elicit, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
Elicit is currently #5 out of 18 entities in AI Search Engines, with a 87 overall AI visibility score across 5 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.
Elicit is currently #4 out of 18 AI Search Engines entities, with a 86.2 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Elicit trails Consensus by 1.4 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from gemini, where Elicit records a 89.7 AI Index and 89% mention rate. Grok is the next strongest covered engine at 88 with a 85% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is Kimi, where Elicit records a 83 AI Index and 82% mention rate. ChatGPT is another engine to watch at 84.3 with a 84% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Elicit in AI Search Engines category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.
Elicit's strongest current visibility comes from ChatGPT (92.1 AI Index, 92% mention rate) and gemini (90.3 AI Index, 90% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is Kimi (83 AI Index, 82% mention rate) and Grok (83.2 AI Index, 84% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Elicit or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Open trend explorerElicit has limited historical movement in the current public payload. Use the latest AI Index, engine coverage, and mention-rate signals as the primary read until more completed runs are available.
Elicit improved over the visible trend window, moving from 86.2 on 2026-04-28 to 88.5 on 2026-06-27. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
SearchGPT is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Elicit behind it by 1.3 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is Elicit ranked in the AI Search Engines leaderboard?
Elicit is included because tracked AI engines surface it in AI Search Engines prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for Elicit?
The strongest current signal is gemini at 89.7 AI Index and 89% mention rate. The softest covered signal is Kimi at 83 AI Index and 82% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with Elicit?
The most useful nearby comparison is Consensus. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed AI Search Engines leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-04-28.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 5 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for AI Search Engines.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.