AI Visibility Profile · Category · AI Search Engines
Consensus AI Visibility in AI Search Engines
Consensus ranks #6 of 18 in the AI Search Engines AI visibility leaderboard with a 86.8 AI Index across 5 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How Consensus appears in AI search
Consensus currently ranks #6 out of 18 in the AI Search Engines AI visibility leaderboard with a 86.8 AI Index across 5 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Consensus AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention Consensus, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
Consensus is currently #6 out of 18 entities in AI Search Engines, with a 86.8 overall AI visibility score across 5 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.
Consensus is currently #3 out of 18 AI Search Engines entities, with a 87.6 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Consensus trails Phind by 2.6 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from gemini, where Consensus records a 91.1 AI Index and 90% mention rate. Grok is the next strongest covered engine at 89 with a 86% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is DeepSeek, where Consensus records a 84.8 AI Index and 84% mention rate. Kimi is another engine to watch at 85.7 with a 85% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Consensus in AI Search Engines category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.
Consensus's strongest current visibility comes from ChatGPT (91.9 AI Index, 91% mention rate) and gemini (89.1 AI Index, 88% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is Grok (82.6 AI Index, 83% mention rate) and DeepSeek (84.9 AI Index, 84% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Consensus or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Open trend explorerConsensus's visible trend window should be read together with engine coverage and mention-rate movement. A single score move is useful context, but it is not enough to describe the product's broader market position.
Consensus improved over the visible trend window, moving from 45.5 on 2026-04-22 to 87.8 on 2026-06-27. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
Elicit is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Consensus behind it by 0.2 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is Consensus ranked in the AI Search Engines leaderboard?
Consensus is included because tracked AI engines surface it in AI Search Engines prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for Consensus?
The strongest current signal is gemini at 91.1 AI Index and 90% mention rate. The softest covered signal is DeepSeek at 84.8 AI Index and 84% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with Consensus?
The most useful nearby comparison is Phind. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed AI Search Engines leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-04-28.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 5 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for AI Search Engines.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.