AI Visibility Profile · Industry · Professional Services

KPMG AI Visibility in Professional Services

KPMG ranks #7 of 10 in the Professional Services AI visibility leaderboard with a 52.7 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.

Entity Score
53
Leaderboard rank #7 of 10

AI visibility answer

How KPMG appears in AI search

KPMG currently ranks #7 out of 10 in the Professional Services AI visibility leaderboard with a 52.7 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for KPMG AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.

The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention KPMG, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.

Industry Rank
#7
Engines Covered
3
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
Jun 26, 2026

Entity Snapshot

KPMG is currently #7 out of 10 entities in Professional Services, with a 52.7 overall AI visibility score across 3 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.

Strongest visibility currently comes from Grok (66 AI Index, 100% mention rate) and gemini (58 AI Index, 80% mention rate). These engines provide the best evidence that the brand is being selected consistently when AI systems answer this category.

Visibility is relatively weaker in ChatGPT (34 AI Index, 20% mention rate) and gemini (58 AI Index, 80% mention rate). Those lower-scoring engines are the main places to investigate if recommendation consistency needs to improve.

KPMG's strongest current visibility comes from Grok (66 AI Index, 100% mention rate) and gemini (58 AI Index, 80% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is ChatGPT (34 AI Index, 20% mention rate) and gemini (58 AI Index, 80% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for KPMG or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

KPMG is trending upward based on recent AI visibility runs, moving from 31.3 to 52.7 for a +21.3 point change.

KPMG improved over the visible trend window, moving from 31.3 on 2026-06-22 to 52.7 on 2026-06-26. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

KPMG improved over the visible trend window, moving from 31.3 on 2026-06-22 to 52.7 on 2026-06-26. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

Engine Breakdown

ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Jun 26, 2026
Rank
#6
AI Index
34.0
Mention Rate
20.0%
gemini
gemini
Jun 26, 2026
Rank
#7
AI Index
58.0
Mention Rate
80.0%
Grok
Grok
Jun 26, 2026
Rank
#6
AI Index
66.0
Mention Rate
100.0%

Comparable Entities

BCG is the closest comparable entity by rank, with KPMG behind it by 1.3 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is KPMG ranked in the Professional Services leaderboard?

KPMG is ranked using its current overall AI visibility score across tracked engines in Professional Services, combining rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for KPMG?

The latest engine breakdown shows the strongest visibility in Grok and relatively weaker visibility in ChatGPT.

Which entities should be compared with KPMG?

KPMG is compared most directly with BCG, Bain, and EY in the current Professional Services leaderboard.

How often is this page updated?

The page updates whenever new completed leaderboard runs are available for this industry.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 3 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Professional Services.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.