AI Visibility Profile · Industry · Personal Care
Garnier AI Visibility in Personal Care
Garnier ranks #4 of 30 in the Personal Care AI visibility leaderboard with a 24.7 AI Index across 6 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How Garnier appears in AI search
Garnier currently ranks #4 out of 30 in the Personal Care AI visibility leaderboard with a 24.7 AI Index across 6 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Garnier AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention Garnier, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
Garnier is currently #4 out of 30 entities in Personal Care, with a 24.7 overall AI visibility score across 6 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.
Garnier is currently #14 out of 30 tracked Personal Care entities, with a 15.7 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Garnier trails Crest by 0.1 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from Grok, where Garnier records a 24 AI Index and 0% mention rate. ChatGPT is the next strongest covered engine at 20 with a 0% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is DeepSeek, where Garnier records a 7 AI Index and 0% mention rate. gemini is another engine to watch at 8 with a 0% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Garnier in Personal Care prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.
Garnier's strongest current visibility comes from DeepSeek (49.1 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate) and MiniMax (29.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is ChatGPT (11.4 AI Index, 28.6% mention rate) and gemini (16 AI Index, 0% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Garnier or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Open trend explorerGarnier's latest visible AI Index is 15.7. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.
Garnier softened over the visible trend window, moving from 18 on 2026-04-29 to 17.5 on 2026-06-26. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
Dove is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Garnier behind it by 1.8 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is Garnier ranked in the Personal Care leaderboard?
Garnier is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Personal Care prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for Garnier?
The strongest current signal is Grok at 24 AI Index and 0% mention rate. The softest covered signal is DeepSeek at 7 AI Index and 0% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with Garnier?
The most useful nearby comparison is Crest. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed Personal Care leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-09.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 6 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Personal Care.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.