AI Visibility Profile · Industry · Messaging Apps
LINE AI Visibility in Messaging Apps
LINE ranks #10 of 29 in the Messaging Apps AI visibility leaderboard with a 28.6 AI Index across 7 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How LINE appears in AI search
LINE currently ranks #10 out of 29 in the Messaging Apps AI visibility leaderboard with a 28.6 AI Index across 7 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for LINE AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention LINE, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
LINE is currently #10 out of 29 entities in Messaging Apps, with a 28.6 overall AI visibility score across 7 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.
LINE is currently #8 out of 30 tracked Messaging Apps entities, with a 30.5 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. LINE trails WeChat by 6 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from ChatGPT, where LINE records a 39.1 AI Index and 42.9% mention rate. Qwen is the next strongest covered engine at 36.4 with a 28.6% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is Kimi, where LINE records a 25 AI Index and 0% mention rate. gemini is another engine to watch at 26.7 with a 14.3% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface LINE in Messaging Apps prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.
LINE's strongest current visibility comes from MiniMax (45.9 AI Index, 57.1% mention rate) and Kimi (37.4 AI Index, 28.6% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is DeepSeek (11.4 AI Index, 28.6% mention rate) and Qwen (13.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for LINE or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Open trend explorerLINE's latest visible AI Index is 30.5. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.
LINE improved over the visible trend window, moving from 21.6 on 2026-05-01 to 30.6 on 2026-06-26. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
Snapchat is the closest comparable entity by rank, with LINE behind it by 0.8 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is LINE ranked in the Messaging Apps leaderboard?
LINE is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Messaging Apps prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for LINE?
The strongest current signal is ChatGPT at 39.1 AI Index and 42.9% mention rate. The softest covered signal is Kimi at 25 AI Index and 0% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with LINE?
The most useful nearby comparison is WeChat. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed Messaging Apps leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-10.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 7 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Messaging Apps.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.