AI Visibility Profile · Industry · Retail Stores
JD.com AI Visibility in Retail Stores
JD.com ranks #18 of 30 in the Retail Stores AI visibility leaderboard with a 10.1 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How JD.com appears in AI search
JD.com currently ranks #18 out of 30 in the Retail Stores AI visibility leaderboard with a 10.1 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for JD.com AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how gemini, DeepSeek, and MiniMax rank or mention JD.com, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
JD.com is currently #18 out of 30 entities in Retail Stores, with a 10.1 overall AI visibility score across 3 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.
JD.com is currently #21 out of 30 tracked Retail Stores entities, with a 9.5 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. JD.com trails Sephora by 0.5 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from ChatGPT, where JD.com records a 15 AI Index and 0% mention rate. DeepSeek is the next strongest covered engine at 4 with a 0% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is DeepSeek, where JD.com records a 4 AI Index and 0% mention rate. ChatGPT is another engine to watch at 15 with a 0% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface JD.com in Retail Stores prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.
JD.com's strongest current visibility comes from gemini (19 AI Index, 0% mention rate) and DeepSeek (5.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is DeepSeek (5.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate) and MiniMax (5.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for JD.com or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Open trend explorerJD.com's latest visible AI Index is 9.5. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.
JD.com improved over the visible trend window, moving from 12 on 2026-05-02 to 19 on 2026-06-26. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
Tesco is the closest comparable entity by rank, with JD.com behind it by 4.6 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is JD.com ranked in the Retail Stores leaderboard?
JD.com is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Retail Stores prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for JD.com?
The strongest current signal is ChatGPT at 15 AI Index and 0% mention rate. The softest covered signal is DeepSeek at 4 AI Index and 0% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with JD.com?
The most useful nearby comparison is Sephora. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed Retail Stores leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-10.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 3 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Retail Stores.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.