AI Visibility Profile · Industry · Food Delivery
Glovo AI Visibility in Food Delivery
Glovo ranks #9 of 30 in the Food Delivery AI visibility leaderboard with a 20.5 AI Index across 5 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How Glovo appears in AI search
Glovo currently ranks #9 out of 30 in the Food Delivery AI visibility leaderboard with a 20.5 AI Index across 5 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Glovo AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention Glovo, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
Glovo is currently #9 out of 30 entities in Food Delivery, with a 20.5 overall AI visibility score across 5 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering industry comparison and recommendation prompts.
Glovo is currently #13 out of 30 tracked Food Delivery entities, with a 19.6 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Glovo trails Rappi by 3.3 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from gemini, where Glovo records a 30.4 AI Index and 28.6% mention rate. Qwen is the next strongest covered engine at 20 with a 0% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is DeepSeek, where Glovo records a 13 AI Index and 0% mention rate. ChatGPT is another engine to watch at 16 with a 0% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Glovo in Food Delivery prompts. It does not rank product quality, sales, safety, or real-world market share.
Glovo's strongest current visibility comes from gemini (24.7 AI Index, 14.3% mention rate) and Qwen (22 AI Index, 0% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is Kimi (17 AI Index, 0% mention rate) and Grok (19 AI Index, 0% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Glovo or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Open trend explorerGlovo's latest visible AI Index is 19.6. Read the trend together with engine coverage and mention-rate signals rather than as a standalone forecast. That movement is useful context, but it is strongest when it lines up with engine coverage and mention-rate changes. A single score move should not be read as a full market or product signal.
Glovo improved over the visible trend window, moving from 17 on 2026-04-30 to 21.2 on 2026-06-26. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
Swiggy is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Glovo behind it by 3.6 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is Glovo ranked in the Food Delivery leaderboard?
Glovo is included because tracked AI engines surface it in Food Delivery prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for Glovo?
The strongest current signal is gemini at 30.4 AI Index and 28.6% mention rate. The softest covered signal is DeepSeek at 13 AI Index and 0% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with Glovo?
The most useful nearby comparison is Rappi. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed Food Delivery leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-05-10.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 5 tracked AI engines and the latest completed industry leaderboard run for Food Delivery.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.