AI Visibility Profile · Category · AI Search Engines
Felo Search AI Visibility in AI Search Engines
Felo Search ranks #11 of 18 in the AI Search Engines AI visibility leaderboard with a 78.1 AI Index across 5 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How Felo Search appears in AI search
Felo Search currently ranks #11 out of 18 in the AI Search Engines AI visibility leaderboard with a 78.1 AI Index across 5 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Felo Search AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention Felo Search, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
Felo Search is currently #11 out of 18 entities in AI Search Engines, with a 78.1 overall AI visibility score across 5 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.
Felo Search is currently #6 out of 18 AI Search Engines entities, with a 76.6 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Felo Search trails Scite by 8.8 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from gemini, where Felo Search records a 81.4 AI Index and 80% mention rate. Grok is the next strongest covered engine at 78.6 with a 78% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is DeepSeek, where Felo Search records a 72.8 AI Index and 72% mention rate. ChatGPT is another engine to watch at 73.8 with a 74% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Felo Search in AI Search Engines category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.
Felo Search's strongest current visibility comes from ChatGPT (83.5 AI Index, 84% mention rate) and gemini (80.7 AI Index, 80% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is DeepSeek (72.8 AI Index, 72% mention rate) and Kimi (76.6 AI Index, 76% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Felo Search or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Open trend explorerFelo Search has limited historical movement in the current public payload. Use the latest AI Index, engine coverage, and mention-rate signals as the primary read until more completed runs are available.
Felo Search improved over the visible trend window, moving from 76.6 on 2026-04-28 to 80.4 on 2026-06-27. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
Genspark is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Felo Search behind it by 2.2 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is Felo Search ranked in the AI Search Engines leaderboard?
Felo Search is included because tracked AI engines surface it in AI Search Engines prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for Felo Search?
The strongest current signal is gemini at 81.4 AI Index and 80% mention rate. The softest covered signal is DeepSeek at 72.8 AI Index and 72% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with Felo Search?
The most useful nearby comparison is Scite. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed AI Search Engines leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-04-28.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 5 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for AI Search Engines.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.