AI Visibility Profile · Category · AI Coding Agent

Trae AI Visibility in AI Coding Agent

Trae ranks #7 of 14 in the AI Coding Agent AI visibility leaderboard with a 78.5 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.

Entity Score
79
Leaderboard rank #7 of 14

AI visibility answer

How Trae appears in AI search

Trae currently ranks #7 out of 14 in the AI Coding Agent AI visibility leaderboard with a 78.5 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Trae AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.

The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention Trae, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.

Category Rank
#7
Engines Covered
3
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
Jun 27, 2026

Entity Snapshot

Trae is currently #7 out of 14 entities in AI Coding Agent, with a 78.5 overall AI visibility score across 3 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.

Strongest visibility currently comes from gemini (86.1 AI Index, 86% mention rate) and ChatGPT (83.5 AI Index, 84% mention rate). These engines provide the best evidence that the brand is being selected consistently when AI systems answer this category.

Visibility is relatively weaker in Grok (66 AI Index, 65% mention rate) and ChatGPT (83.5 AI Index, 84% mention rate). Those lower-scoring engines are the main places to investigate if recommendation consistency needs to improve.

Trae's strongest current visibility comes from gemini (86.1 AI Index, 86% mention rate) and ChatGPT (83.5 AI Index, 84% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is Grok (66 AI Index, 65% mention rate) and ChatGPT (83.5 AI Index, 84% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Trae or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

Trae is trending upward based on recent AI visibility runs, moving from 5 to 78.5 for a +73.5 point change.

Trae improved over the visible trend window, moving from 5 on 2026-04-23 to 78.5 on 2026-06-27. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

Trae improved over the visible trend window, moving from 5 on 2026-04-23 to 78.5 on 2026-06-27. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

Engine Breakdown

ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Jun 27, 2026
Rank
#12
AI Index
83.5
Mention Rate
84.0%
gemini
gemini
Jun 27, 2026
Rank
#7
AI Index
86.1
Mention Rate
86.0%
Grok
Grok
Jun 27, 2026
Rank
#13
AI Index
66.0
Mention Rate
65.0%

Comparable Entities

OpenAI Codex is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Trae behind it by 2.3 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is Trae ranked in the AI Coding Agent leaderboard?

Trae is ranked using its current overall AI visibility score across tracked engines in AI Coding Agent, combining rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for Trae?

The latest engine breakdown shows the strongest visibility in gemini and relatively weaker visibility in Grok.

Which entities should be compared with Trae?

Trae is compared most directly with OpenAI Codex, Amazon Q Developer, and Windsurf in the current AI Coding Agent leaderboard.

How often is this page updated?

The page updates whenever new completed leaderboard runs are available for this industry.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 3 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for AI Coding Agent.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.