AI Visibility Profile · Category · AI Coding Agent

Tabby AI Visibility in AI Coding Agent

Tabby ranks #9 of 14 in the AI Coding Agent AI visibility leaderboard with a 75.8 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.

Entity Score
76
Leaderboard rank #9 of 14

AI visibility answer

How Tabby appears in AI search

Tabby currently ranks #9 out of 14 in the AI Coding Agent AI visibility leaderboard with a 75.8 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Tabby AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.

The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention Tabby, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.

Category Rank
#9
Engines Covered
3
Comparable Entities
3
Updated
Jun 27, 2026

Entity Snapshot

Tabby is currently #9 out of 14 entities in AI Coding Agent, with a 75.9 overall AI visibility score across 3 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.

Strongest visibility currently comes from ChatGPT (82 AI Index, 81% mention rate) and gemini (76.2 AI Index, 75% mention rate). These engines provide the best evidence that the brand is being selected consistently when AI systems answer this category.

Visibility is relatively weaker in Grok (69.5 AI Index, 68% mention rate) and gemini (76.2 AI Index, 75% mention rate). Those lower-scoring engines are the main places to investigate if recommendation consistency needs to improve.

Tabby's strongest current visibility comes from ChatGPT (82 AI Index, 81% mention rate) and gemini (76.2 AI Index, 75% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is Grok (69.5 AI Index, 68% mention rate) and gemini (76.2 AI Index, 75% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.

Continue from Here

This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Tabby or a competitor set.

Compare in Trend Explorer

Tabby has remained broadly stable across recent runs, holding near 75.9 on the overall AI visibility index.

Tabby held steady over the visible trend window, moving from 75.9 on 2026-06-10 to 75.9 on 2026-06-27. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

Tabby held steady over the visible trend window, moving from 75.9 on 2026-06-10 to 75.9 on 2026-06-27. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.

Engine Breakdown

ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Jun 27, 2026
Rank
#13
AI Index
82.0
Mention Rate
81.0%
gemini
gemini
Jun 27, 2026
Rank
#14
AI Index
76.2
Mention Rate
75.0%
Grok
Grok
Jun 27, 2026
Rank
#10
AI Index
69.5
Mention Rate
68.0%

Comparable Entities

Amazon Q Developer is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Tabby behind it by 0.5 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.

FAQ

Why is Tabby ranked in the AI Coding Agent leaderboard?

Tabby is ranked using its current overall AI visibility score across tracked engines in AI Coding Agent, combining rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.

Which engines are strongest and weakest for Tabby?

The latest engine breakdown shows the strongest visibility in ChatGPT and relatively weaker visibility in Grok.

Which entities should be compared with Tabby?

Tabby is compared most directly with Amazon Q Developer, JetBrains AI Assistant, and Trae in the current AI Coding Agent leaderboard.

How often is this page updated?

The page updates whenever new completed leaderboard runs are available for this industry.

Methodology and source context

AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 3 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for AI Coding Agent.

Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.