AI Visibility Profile · Category · AI Chat Agents
Microsoft Copilot AI Visibility in AI Chat Agents
Microsoft Copilot ranks #2 of 10 in the AI Chat Agents AI visibility leaderboard with a 87.5 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use this page to compare AI search visibility, engine breakdowns, trend context, and nearby entities.
AI visibility answer
How Microsoft Copilot appears in AI search
Microsoft Copilot currently ranks #2 out of 10 in the AI Chat Agents AI visibility leaderboard with a 87.5 AI Index across 3 tracked AI engines. Use it as a direct answer for Microsoft Copilot AI visibility, AI search ranking, and answer-engine benchmark questions.
The engine breakdown compares how ChatGPT, gemini, and Grok rank or mention Microsoft Copilot, so the page separates broad AI search visibility from single-engine outliers.
Entity Snapshot
Microsoft Copilot is currently #2 out of 10 entities in AI Chat Agents, with a 87.5 overall AI visibility score across 3 tracked engines. That position shows how often AI systems surface the brand when answering category comparison and recommendation prompts.
Microsoft Copilot is currently #3 out of 10 AI Chat Agents entities, with a 78 AI Index in the latest public snapshot. Microsoft Copilot trails Claude by 1.3 AI Index points. The strongest engine-level signal comes from ChatGPT, where Microsoft Copilot records a 78 AI Index and 100% mention rate.
The softer engine-level signal is ChatGPT, where Microsoft Copilot records a 78 AI Index and 100% mention rate. Keep the scope narrow: this page measures how tracked AI engines surface Microsoft Copilot in AI Chat Agents category prompts. It does not rank product quality, security, reliability, compliance, sales, or real-world usage.
Microsoft Copilot's strongest current visibility comes from ChatGPT (88 AI Index, 88% mention rate) and gemini (87.9 AI Index, 88% mention rate). Its weaker engine profile is Grok (86.6 AI Index, 85% mention rate) and gemini (87.9 AI Index, 88% mention rate), so the engine spread points to where recommendation consistency can still improve.
Continue from Here
This public entity page is a neutral starting point. Use Tracker when you want private monitoring for Microsoft Copilot or a competitor set.
Entity Trend
Open trend explorerMicrosoft Copilot has limited historical movement in the current public payload. Use the latest AI Index, engine coverage, and mention-rate signals as the primary read until more completed runs are available.
Microsoft Copilot improved over the visible trend window, moving from 78 on 2026-04-22 to 87.5 on 2026-06-27. Use this trend alongside the engine breakdown to see whether movement is broad or isolated to a few engines.
Engine Breakdown
Comparable Entities
ChatGPT is the closest comparable entity by rank, with Microsoft Copilot behind it by 1.8 AI Index points. This gap is useful for reading whether the page reflects a clear lead, a close contest, or a brand that needs stronger AI evidence to move up.
FAQ
Why is Microsoft Copilot ranked in the AI Chat Agents leaderboard?
Microsoft Copilot is included because tracked AI engines surface it in AI Chat Agents prompts, and AIvsRank calculates its current visibility from rank position, recommendation strength, and mention-rate signals.
Which engines are strongest and weakest for Microsoft Copilot?
The strongest current signal is ChatGPT at 78 AI Index and 100% mention rate. The softest covered signal is ChatGPT at 78 AI Index and 100% mention rate.
Which entities should be compared with Microsoft Copilot?
The most useful nearby comparison is Claude. Compare the score gap and engine-level table before treating rank movement as meaningful.
How often is this page updated?
This page updates when a new completed AI Chat Agents leaderboard run is available. The current public snapshot was refreshed on 2026-04-22.
Methodology and source context
AIvsRank calculates this public entity page from 3 tracked AI engines and the latest completed category leaderboard run for AI Chat Agents.
Use the score, mention-rate, engine breakdown, comparable entities, and trend context together; no single chart or paragraph should be read as the whole visibility signal.